Edit: this post was marked as spam by the community & was hidden, but I don’t know why. Please let me know what’s wrong with it before hiding it again. Thanks!
Thanks, Donald. I’m coming from an arts & engineering background, so I appreciate your experience with biodiversity data. The GBIF numbers look higher to me:
Biota
COL: 1,896,632 (Taxon | COL)
GBIF: 2,182,233 (Sum of GBIF kingdom species below)
Animalia
COL: 1,339,437 (/taxon/N)
GBIF: 1,709,526 (https://api.gbif.org/v1/species/search?rank=SPECIES&highertaxon_key=1&limit=0&status=ACCEPTED)
Archaea
COL 377 (/taxon/R)
GBIF 1,092 (?rank=SPECIES&highertaxon_key=2&limit=0&status=ACCEPTED)
Bacteria
COL: 9,980 (/taxon/B)
GBIF: 26,089 (?rank=SPECIES&highertaxon_key=3&limit=0&status=ACCEPTED)
Chromista
COL 21,294 (/taxon/C)
GBIF: 100,288 (?rank=SPECIES&highertaxon_key=4&limit=0&status=ACCEPTED)
Fungi
COL 146,155 (/taxon/F)
GBIF: 227,509 (?rank=SPECIES&highertaxon_key=5&limit=0&status=ACCEPTED)
Plantae
COL 370,236 (/taxon/P)
GBIF: 475,893 (?rank=SPECIES&highertaxon_key=6&limit=0&status=ACCEPTED)
Protozoa
COL 2,565 (/taxon/Z)
GBIF: 5,271 (?rank=SPECIES&highertaxon_key=7&limit=0&status=ACCEPTED)
Viruses
COL 6,588 (/taxon/V)
GBIF: 6,654 (?rank=SPECIES&highertaxon_key=8&limit=0&status=ACCEPTED)
I don’t see an API for COL, but the data is available to download (Metadata | COL) & I’ve got an SQLite database going now to cache counts on higher taxa nodes—so I could use either GBIF or COL. Which would you go with?
For context: I’m working on an educational product that visualizes species numbers & incorporates data from the Red List. I’m trying to work in empty gaps to visualize species we don’t know about—so putting the caveats front & center. That’s the most interesting part of the story.
Cheers,
Raphael